By Lord Fiifi Quayle
The future of Ghana’s food basket hangs in the balance, caught between the promise of regenerative agriculture and the hard reality of decades-old farming practices. While the world embraces a shift to heal the soil, experts warn that for Ghana, a sudden, wholesale abandonment of chemical fertilizers is not just impractical—it’s a direct threat to national food security. The path forward, they argue, must be a carefully balanced mix of old and new, driven by science and supported by the state.

Regeneration vs. Sustainability: A Crucial Difference
For years, sustainable farming has been the goal a practice aimed at maintaining the status quo and preventing further resource depletion. Regenerative agriculture, however, goes a step further. It is a proactive movement focused on actively rebuilding and restoring the health of the soil.
Regenerative practices; such as minimizing soil disturbance, maximizing crop diversity, and keeping the ground covered, are designed to turn farmland into a powerful carbon sink, reversing the damage caused by conventional methods. It’s a shift from merely ‘doing no harm’ to actively ‘doing good’ for the land.
Climate Change and the Soil Crisis
The health of our soil is the foundation of our food supply, but it is under siege from climate change. The increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, while sometimes initially boosting plant growth, are fundamentally altering soil chemistry. This can lead to soil acidification and a critical imbalance of nutrients, ultimately degrading the very fertility we rely on.
The loss of soil carbon, exacerbated by traditional tilling, releases more carbon dioxide back into the air, creating a dangerous cycle. Regenerative methods offer a lifeline, increasing soil organic carbon and helping Ghana’s farms become more resilient to drought and extreme weather.
The Chemical Conundrum: Food Security at Risk
Chemical fertilizers were once hailed as the saviour of global food production, but their overuse has created a new crisis. While they boost yields in the short term, the long-term cost is severe: they deplete soil health, reduce microbial diversity, and contribute significantly to water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
For Ghana, the constant application of chemicals without holistic management leads to a vicious cycle of dependency and diminishing returns. The environmental impact is clear, but the threat to long-term food security is even more alarming.
The Ghanaian Reality: North, South, and the Scars of Galamsey
The call for a transition to regenerative farming must be tempered by the complex realities on the ground. Ghana’s soil is not uniform.
In the Northern regions, farmers face distinct challenges and nutrient profiles. Meanwhile, much of the Southern belt struggles with naturally acidic soils (pH < 5.5), which severely limits crop productivity.
Worse still, large tracts of land, particularly in the South, have been severely degraded by illegal mining activities (Galamsey). The introduction of heavy metals and chemicals, including cyanide, has left the soil contaminated and structurally compromised.
To ignore these differences and push for a one-size-fits-all regenerative approach would be a recipe for disaster, risking a severe shortage of food in the short term.
The First Step: A National Soil Diagnosis
The consensus among agricultural experts is clear: before any major transition, Ghana must undertake a comprehensive, district-by-district soil research and diagnostic program.
This is the critical first step. We must know precisely what each piece of land lacks; its nutrient deficiencies, its pH levels, and the extent of contamination. This data will allow the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MOFA) to formulate site-specific, Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) plans that combine the best of both worlds: targeted, minimal use of necessary inputs with regenerative practices.
Building the Economic Case: What’s In It For the Farmer?
For regenerative agriculture to take root, it must be market-driven and commercially viable. The transition cannot be solely the farmer’s burden.
Government Enabling and Policy Stability:
The government’s role is crucial. It must establish long-term policies that survive changes in administration, ensuring stability for farmers and investors. A key priority must be the strict regularization of chemical fertilizer sellers and inputs, enforcing laws like the Plants and Fertiliser Act, 2010 (Act 803). This is not a ban, but a necessary step to ensure quality and promote judicious, data-driven use.
Engaging the Private Sector:
The private sector is key to commercializing regeneration. The government can enable this through:
- Tax Incentives: Offering tax breaks for farmers who invest in no-till equipment and cover crops.
- Carbon Credit Schemes: Facilitating the participation of Ghanaian farmers in international carbon markets, providing new revenue streams for sequestering carbon.
- Market Access: Creating premium market labels for regeneratively grown produce, allowing farmers to command higher prices and see a clear return on their investment.
The Integrated Path Forward
Is regenerative agriculture the way forward? Yes, absolutely. It is the most potent strategy to combat soil degradation and enhance climate resilience.
But can we do away with chemical fertilizers entirely? Not yet.
The most pragmatic solution for Ghana is the Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) approach. This strategy blends the restorative principles of regeneration with the targeted, necessary use of mineral fertilizers, all guided by scientific soil testing.
The future of Ghanaian agriculture lies not in a radical, all-or-nothing shift, but in a balanced, data-driven, and commercially supported transition that systematically improves the texture and structure of our soil, securing both ecological health and national food security for generations to come.
This article is based on research and analysis by a team spread across Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal.








