By Lord Fiifi Quayle

In the annals of Ghanaian politics, few narratives are as convoluted and perplexing as that of Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo aka King Promise. To many, he is a symbol of perseverance and resilience, a man who has navigated the treacherous waters of political ambition for decades. However, a closer examination of his journey reveals a more troubling story—one that raises questions about his true intentions and the impact of his leadership on the people of Ghana.

Nana Akufo-Addo’s presidential ambition began in earnest in the mid-1990s when he sought the leadership of the New Patriotic Party (NPP). His aspirations were thwarted by John Agyekum Kufuor, a defeat that would shape his political trajectory. Following this setback, Akufo-Addo opted to leave Ghana for the United Kingdom, ostensibly to regroup and strategize. During this time, his contributions to the party were minimal, a sentiment echoed by party stalwart Kennedy Ohene Agyapong, who has been vocal about Akufo-Addo’s lack of commitment during crucial periods.

After the NPP’s loss in the 2008 elections, which many attributed to internal divisions and discontent with Kufuor’s administration, Akufo-Addo again retreated to the UK. It was during this period that he and his family seemingly orchestrated a plan to return to power—not as agents of change for the Ghanaian people, but as architects of a scheme to enrich themselves and their inner circle. This raises the question: was his time abroad a period of reflection and growth, or a calculated move to position himself for a future comeback?

Upon his return to Ghana and subsequent election as president in 2016, Akufo-Addo presented himself as a champion of the people, promising to address the myriad challenges facing the nation. However, as his tenure progressed, it became increasingly clear that his administration was more focused on consolidating power and wealth than on genuinely serving the populace. The “Ghana Beyond Aid” mantra, which was supposed to signify a new era of self-reliance, has been overshadowed by allegations of corruption and nepotism that have plagued his government.

Critics argue that Akufo-Addo’s leadership style is reminiscent of a long con—an elaborate ruse designed to mislead the very people he vowed to uplift. From the controversial handling of public funds to the questionable appointments of family and friends to key government positions, the evidence suggests a pattern of behavior that prioritizes personal gain over public service. This has led to widespread disillusionment among Ghanaians who once placed their hopes in his promises of change.

Moreover, the discontent within the NPP itself, particularly regarding the perceived favoritism towards certain factions within the party, has further alienated many of his supporters. The fallout from his administration’s policies has left a bitter taste in the mouths of those who expected more from a leader with such a storied political background.

As we reflect on Nana Akufo-Addo’s journey from a young politician to the highest office in the land, it is essential to scrutinize the motivations behind his actions. While he may have played the long game, the question remains: at what cost to the people of Ghana? The time has come for a reckoning, one that holds leaders accountable for their promises and their performance. Ghanaians deserve a leader who prioritizes their needs over personal ambition, and it is clear that the current trajectory under Akufo-Addo’s administration is not one that fosters trust or hope for the future.

Nana Akufo-Addo’s political saga serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of ambition unchecked by genuine concern for the people. As Ghana navigates its path forward, it is imperative that citizens remain vigilant, demanding accountability and integrity from those in power. The era of playing the longest con must come to an end, and the time for true leadership is now.